Sunday, April 6, 2008

10 ideas that are changing the world: #4 reverse radicalism

Findings have shown what stands out among radicals is that long before the blasts, all of them had mentally killed their targets and what radical ideology does is deny the humanity of groups.

The question is: What makes a radical?

Firstly, what makes a radical is history and human nature. Experts say it is human nature to want to see oneself in an “in” group that is different from an “out” group – to have an “us” versus “them” mindset. History also plays a part, in societies with a history of conflict between groups, history is passed down. People are taught from young to hate and often, instructors are needed to deepen and shape those prejudices.

In addition, group pressure also contributes to making a radical. Fighting with others in a transnational jihad, their “us versus them” mindsets intensified, as did their belief in the need to fight non-Muslims to establish an Islamic state when they returned. At times even individuals capable of thinking for themselves felt powerless when faced with these group pressures.

Thirdly, it is due to culture. Javanese culture places a strong emphasis on respect for seniors, which makes many of the JI members conform and respect those in authority in their group. Even when the destructive effects of their work become patently clear, and they are asked to carry out actions incompatible with fundamental standards of morality, relatively few people have the resources needed to resist authority.

Lastly, personality plays a part in making a radical. Those with strong internal locus, who believe they can change the world are more likely to control and manipulate the more passive ones.

In reverse radicalism, Amanda Ripley states “ none are truly deradicalized. Disengagement is more realistic. “ She gave an example of Nasir Abas who was strong enough to turn in some members of the Jemaah Islamiah who were plotting to kill innocent people. He seems to be deradicalized, to have turned away from being an extremist, however, Nasir said that he still supports the creation of an Islamic state ans says Muslims have a right to kill U.S. soldiers in Iraq. This could be because of the factors stated above. It changes the world to a certain extent, but the crux of the problem will not be solved as long as even a little of it remains.

source: The Straits Times

No comments: